Fairfield Financial Services, Inc. - Private Money Loans, Lending & Borrowing

Private Money Source Investor Blog

Two hicks from Oregon go to Malibu – a cautionary tale

November 11th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

The runway was drenched in sunlight as our plane touched down that morning at LAX.  It was a golden balmy day.  We grabbed our bags and headed for the rental car kiosks.  I don’t recall how it happened exactly, but the fellow at the counter said something like, “I can make you a real good deal on a sporty little convertible.  Do you want it?”  We looked at each other and shrugged, “Why not, let’s have some fun.”

It was a business trip, me traveling as a private money loan broker and accompanied by Alan, a stalwart friend and investor of many years.  Over the past two weeks we had been carefully picking our way through a loan file for a request to loan money on a bare land parcel in the Malibu hills.  This was not a normal loan for us.  At this point, we had not expanded our regional boundaries much beyond Oregon and Washington.  California would have seemed strange to us, but Malibu was like another planet.  Still, this was in the glory days of the California Empire, back when money ran free in the streets, and we were having a hard time finding good reasons not to like the loan, so we finally decided it was time to go have a look for ourselves.

We hopped into the little red convertible—top down, ready to go.  I don’t recall who navigated and who drove, but eventually we found ourselves cruising south along the coast and really enjoying the ride, the sunshine, and the beautiful sparking blue sea.  “I’m sure we must be quite a sight,” said Alan, “two pasty white Oregonians on the California coast riding high in a bright red convertible.”  Some SP 40 and a couple of old baseball hats would have been useful, but we were in a hurry to get to our meeting and couldn’t stop to shop.

Our designated meeting spot was just off highway 101 near a small Realtors office at a cross-road leading into the Malibu hills.  We pulled up a few minutes late and found two cars and three people waiting.  The loan broker who had been the point man on the project was there.  He was standing and talking to two other guys.  We were introduced to our borrower.  He was quite young (maybe mid-twenties), well dressed with a pony tail and friendly enough but a bit on the slick side (at least by Oregon hick standards, that is).  His sports car—an Audi TT—was a real sports car, unlike our little domestic model.  The other fellow (quite young himself) was introduced by the borrower.  The introduction was a bit vague and came out sort of mumbled; somewhere in there, we thought we heard the word “appraiser.”  We noticed quickly that he and the borrower appeared to be quite friendly with one other—a couple of old pals maybe.

After exchanging pleasantries, we all hopped into our respective vehicles and fell in line behind the TT.  The kid was working the peddle hard and seemed to be making a point as we wound our way around hairpin turns on this high windy gravel road; we struggled to keep up with the spray of gravel.  Somehow we eventually managed to arrive alive and intact at the subject property, and everyone got out and stomped around in the dirt for awhile.

The circumstances were pretty simple.  The kid’s father owned the property and was holding it as part of the kid’s inheritance.  The kid planned to use the free and clear property as collateral for a loan that he would utilize to pay for tuition (or some such thing).  There were no immediate plans for development, but we were told that the property was fully accredited, meaning it was fully qualified as a buildable parcel for one residence.  (Of course this is no small thing; in the hills of Malibu, CA the ecosystem of these hills has been seriously stressed due to over-building and becoming accredited for a new structure is no easy task.)

So after some walking and pointing and a series of questions and explanations, I lead into my most pressing concern.  It had occurred to me on the flight down that there was a potentially serious error with the appraisal.  This error (assuming it was an error in this case) is a surprisingly frequent error in appraisals; I have seen it many times over the years.  Let’s call it the Fallacy of Infinite Scalability.  In order to demonstrate the Fallacy of Infinite Scalability, I’ll use an example.  Let’s say that our subject property is a five acre parcel and that we are looking at a comp which is a one acre parcel.  Assuming that the one acre parcel qualifies as a buildable parcel by virtue of size (say it was grandfathered in when the zoning was changed to 5 acre minimum size per site) and that the five acre parcel cannot be subdivided further (due to the change in zoning), then we cannot compare these properties acre for acre.  If the one acre comp parcel sold for $800,000, then we would not be correct to say that the five acre parcel, all other things being equal, is worth $4,000,000.  That would be the Fallacy of Infinite Scalability.  Instead we must determine the base price of one home site–in this case the first acre–and then determine the incremental value of each additional (incremental) acre.  So for example, we might determine that the one acre parcel is worth $800,000 and that each incremental acre is worth $50,000, giving us a total of $1,000,000.

However, by my interpretation of the appraisal and in the absence of further information, the appraiser had committed this error in determining the value of our subject property.  So I asked of the third fellow, “Are you the appraiser?”  “Uh … well no, I’m not the appraiser,” he muttered, “I’m his assistant.”  This seemed odd.  I couldn’t recall a time that an appraiser’s assistant had ever been sent to a site review.  At any rate, I went ahead and asked him about the appraisal and in particular whether or not the Fallacy of Infinite Scalability was at work here.  He scratched his head a bit, looked kind of confused, rocked back and forth with his hands in his pockets, and indicated that he really didn’t know the answer to my question.  “Okay, I’m going to have to speak to the appraiser,” I said.  At which point the assistant most adamantly explained that the actual appraiser did not like to talk to clients and could not be talked to (or something to that effect).

I countered that without a reasonable explanation for the apparent Fallacy of Infinite Scalability error I could not proceed and that I really needed to speak to the appraiser.  There was much commotion and back and forth between the kid and the assistant, until finally the assistant said that he would call the appraiser and see if he would speak to me.  Eventually he managed to get a signal and contacted the appraiser who apparently agreed to have me put on the line.  I took the phone and proceeded to ask about the appraisal and to what extent the Fallacy of Infinite Scalability applied.  The appraiser sounded frail and confused and was barely audible.  I walked him as carefully as I could back through the question a second time, much as I did for you the reader above, but he still didn’t answer.  It became clear that he simply could not respond to my question.

Well … at this point I glanced at my watch and I looked over at Alan. He looked back and said, “You know what?  We’ve got a flight to make.  We’ve gotta get back to Oregon.”  “That’s right,” I said.  “We’ll call you all once we’ve had a chance to talk this over,” and away we went.  And as we drove back up the coast the horror stories played out in our minds:  an appraiser held captive in his own home, tied to a chair, perhaps drugged into submission, or just a very old man gone senile and his son taking over his work, his license … and maybe his signature.  There were many possible interpretations, and we tended to favor the most hideous.

I learned a long time ago that a loan not done for the right reasons is a successful loan and so I put this one in the win column (and so did Alan, I believe).  On the flight back that evening we looked down at the sea and felt grateful for our pleasant journey, for the tragedy narrowly averted, and just to be on our way back to Portland in time for dinner, whole, intact, and more or less unscathed by the experience.  Of course, there was the small matter of our bright red sunburned heads which were—surprisingly–beginning to approximate the color of that cute little California sports car which we had just left behind.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Top ten ways you know it might be time to consider private money

November 1st, 2009

Clay Sparkman

I thought it would be nice to publish something just for fun today.  I originally wrote and published this TOP TEN list on our web site man years ago.  I think it is still relevant after all this time.

Again, keep in mind, this is done purely for the sake of laughter, so take it in the spirit in which it is intended.  It actually tends to reinforce some stereotypes that I have worked hard for many years to dispel regarding private money and the borrowers of private money so don’t take it too seriously.  Still – just this one time, I couldn’t resist. Drum roll please…

Top ten ways you know it might be time to consider private money:

10. The bank asks you to return the promotional pen which they gave you last month.

9. Your neighbor keeps throwing orange peels and egg shells on your house because they think it is a compost pile.

8. You are continually confusing your FICO score with your bowling score.

7. The Account Rep for your favorite lending institution laughs so hard that he suffers a hernia and is rushed off to the hospital before you can finish telling him about your loan request.

6. When figuring your net worth on a 1003, you include as assets: your karma, your winning smile, your exotic house cat Ms. Buttons, and your $5,000 instructional video course on how to make a million bucks investing in real estate.

5. The bank officer repeatedly refers to your floating home as a “boat”, and insists on using terms and expressions like “port” and “bow,” and “thar she blows.”

4. Meth lab shmeth lab! (A true real estate investor doesn’t let minor obstacles stand in her way.)

3. Your down-payment consists of twelve cases of Budweiser empties, an IBM 386 computer, and a Tim Duncan rookie card.

2. Your timeline is so short that you are working on a scheme which involves flying an escrow team westward to the international dateline and closing the deal at 12,000 feet.

1. The land which you hope to borrow against is so raw that it bleeds when you stick a fork in it.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

The private money lending business: likes and gripes (part III)

October 19th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

I finished Part II with a brief mention of something I quite like about the trust deed system: that is, the option (generally available) to foreclose judicially.

Before moving on, I’d like to offer you a crude little decision tree which may guide investors in making the decision whether to foreclose a given trust deed judicially or non-judicially.

First, do you have an option to foreclose this particular trust deed non-judicially?  If the answer is no, then foreclose judicially.  If the answer is yes, continue.

Do you believe, with a high degree of confidence and having done sufficient research, that you are likely to fully recover by taking back the property at auction and then selling it?  If the answer is yes, then foreclose non-judicially. If the answer is no, then continue.

Do you believe, again with a relatively high degree of confidence and having done adequate research, that the borrower/personal guarantor has sufficient income and/or assets that you would stand a pretty fair chance of recovering on a deficiency judgment?  If the answer is yes, then foreclose judicially.  If the answer is no, then foreclose non-judicially.

Now moving on:  Today I will focus on a few website based tools that I have found to be useful in the business.

Let’s start locally (Portland, Oregon) and then expand out from there.  A really nice little site if you are doing business in the Portland area is:

www.Portlandmaps.com

The City of Portland provides PortlandMaps.com as a new way of easily accessing public data regarding properties and property areas.  A wide variety of data is available for the Portland Metropolitan Area, including the following:

  • Assessor/Tax Lot Information
  • Aerial Photography
  • Building Footprints
  • Building Permits
  • Census
  • Crime Data
  • Elevation
  • Parks
  • Mass Transit
  • Natural Hazard
  • Schools
  • Urban Growth Boundary
  • Underground Storage Tanks
  • Water/Sewer
  • Zip Code
  • Zoning Maps

Fortunately most states offer all kinds of helpful data on-line now.  For instance, this handy site offered by the state of Oregon gives you access to a wide range of licenses, permits, and registrations.

www.licenseinfo.oregon.gov/index.cfm

Of particular interest to me is this site which allows me to lookup a mortgage broker’s license:

www.licenseinfo.oregon.gov/?fuseaction=link_class&class_list=1732,14592,26398&class_name=Mortgage%20lenders&LinkType=P

It is also frequently useful to lookup the license status of a given contractor, which you may do in Oregon at:

www.licenseinfo.oregon.gov/?fuseaction=link_class&class_list=13833,13830,13831,1536,1551,1683,1537,1555,1556,1713,1677,1666,1665,13829,13828,1739,14724,26481,1674&class_name=Construction%20contractors&LinkType=P

I’m sure that just about everyone in this business already knows about Zillow:

www.zillow.com

Zillow is a great little comp tool, easy to use, with a vast national database, and free.  It does not offer the range of options available with most professional comp tools, but then they are expensive.  I can remember when we first signed up to MetroScan at Fairfield.  The price was very substantial and the software was localized to the machine, so that you could only use it at one workstation at one site without paying even more, and updates were given monthly via mailed CD-ROMs.  We also had very limited regional access and had to pay for access by county (that is if a particular county were available at all).  We’ve come a long way.

Also, I hear good things about the Zillow blog, though I haven’t had time to properly check it out for myself:

www.zillow.com/blog

I know I don’t need to tell anyone about Google Earth.  When I was first introduced to this site, I just about fell off my chair!  I still can’t quite believe that such a powerful far reaching tool exists, at my fingertips and for free.

http://earth.google.com

And it just keeps getting better.  The Street View layer of Google Earth is incredible.  It allows you to do drive by inspections from your home office or living room.  Of course it is not really as good a an actual drive by, but it certainly allows you to get a feel for a property and its neighborhood.

Now, if you want to look at real estate trend data for a given area—something I would think you would want to do these days before making just about any loan—this site is terrific:

www.altosresearch.com/altos/Home.page

The Scotsman Guide has long been regarded as the “bible” of the commercial and residential loan industry, offering detailed categorical listings of various active lenders and loan sources.  Their online site is here:

www.clender.com

And Lendicom may be of interest to you.  This site is geared toward commercial lending, and allows borrowers and brokers to sign up and submit specific loan proposals to lenders who have also signed up online.  If you are a hard money lender looking directly for commercial loans to fund, you may sign up as a lender and create an account that allows you to specify detailed criteria regarding the specific loans that you would be interested in.  In the interest of full disclosure, I am an officer and a part owner of the company that offers this site.  Maybe that’s why I like it so much.

www.lendicom.com

So that’s a lot to like, wouldn’t you agree?  It is hard to imagine that just ten years ago, none of this existed.  And there is so much more.  Please write in and tell us about other tools that you know of and websites of interest.

End of Part III

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

The private money lending business: likes and gripes (part II)

October 3rd, 2009

Clay Sparkman

In Part I, I began a discussion of my gripes and likes regarding the private money lending business and various industry related matters, items, and issues.  I allowed myself to amble a bit far afield and concluded by mentioning a book about the legal profession which I personally found to be informing and entertaining.  I’d like to indulge myself a bit more on this topic of books at least marginally related to private money investing.

An author who I particularly enjoyed this past year is Michael Lewis.  Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game is one of the most interesting and influential books that I have read in a very long time.  This book on the face of it is about baseball, but in fact it is about so much more.  The book is really about exploiting pockets of inefficiency that inevitably exist in markets (for various curious reasons), and I frequently find myself applying lessons learned in this book to the way I think about other aspects of business and life in general.  There is most definitely an element of applicability to private money lending and trust deed based lending.  If you have read it, please comment and tell us if you don’t feel the same.  (A hat tip: to Charles Duck who gave this book to me and told me to read it some good three years ago;  I’m only sorry that I waited so long.)

Another Michael Lewis book that became extremely relevant with the recent collapse of large financial firms on Wall Street (though written many years before and published in 1989) is Liar’s Poker: Rising through the Wreckage on Wall Street.  This book chronicles the author’s years as a bond trader for Salomon Brothers.  The inside look is riveting and terrifying at the same time, and may help explain how things could have gone so terribly wrong during the recent fall from grace.  And I must mention Home Game, Lewis’s book about the business of parenting.  As the father of a 4 year old boy, this book worked for me (though I warn you it is quite different from his other books, doesn’t have much to do with business and investing, and you may not enjoy it if you don’t have children of your own).

As one who brokers and services private money loans, a thing that I particularly like is quite simple:  I like it when the loan payments come in on time each month as per the contractual agreement and without any prodding from my office.  Fortunately this happens quite frequently and it makes my life and the life of those who work for me so much easier.  It also opens up the possibility for an extended ongoing relationship with the borrower.  Most of our borrowers tend to need private money loans on an ongoing basis; they use them to drive a series of ongoing professional projects.  And this is another thing I quite like in the business: ongoing, long-term professional relationships with borrowers, brokers, and investors.  Things get so much easier when you know who you are dealing with.

I do not like it so much when borrowers become “bad boys,” having to be prompted and prodded each month to send in their payments, and consistently push the envelope, going beyond the boundaries of their agreement.  This provides a certain level of strain, both physical and emotional within my organization and with certain of my investors.  I will say, though, that I have had cases where the borrower paid just a few days past the grace period each and every month, almost like clock-work, and certain lenders really liked it, as they knew that the payment was coming and that it would be accompanied by a substantial late fee and default interest payment as well.  This type of situation tends to push the yield up, so that a 13% loan may ultimately yield 15-16% to the investor over the life of the loan.

I do like it when borrowers who are having problems actively communicate and behave in a proactive and professional manner—seeking to work with the investors in an attempt to navigate through their financial problems and with the intention of ultimately making good on the overall commitment.  I have found that investors tend to be quite reasonable in working with borrowers who are reasonable–so that quite often a successful “work out” is possible.  In these situations there is ultimate satisfaction for all parties as everyone tends to benefit.

I don’t like it when borrowers who are struggling put their heads in the sand and go into hiding.  Once communication stops, there is no chance for a work out, and the only choice is to foreclose, go to auction, take back the property (if a higher bidder doesn’t take it at auction), and then go about the business of marketing the property.  This can still have a good ending and probably does as often as not, but the work involved is immense, and most loan servicers and investors would rather not go there.  Fortunately, though this certainly happens, it doesn’t happen frequently (though a bit more frequently than usual during the difficulties of the past two year period).

I do like the fact that investors generally have an option, in these situations to either foreclose judicially or non-judicially.  The non-judicial option is faster, easier, and more predictable, but the judicial option allows a the investor to obtain a deficiency judgment should the property fail to fully compensate the debt—and thus gives the investor an opportunity to recover any remaining obligation by chasing borrower income and assets.

In Part III, I will be highlighting some web based resources that I find to be particularly useful, enjoyable, and impressive.  If you have any sites that you feel enable you to make better moves and decisions as you invest in trust deeds, please send me a note, and I will most likely include your information in Part III of this post.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

End of part II

The private money lending business: likes and gripes (part I)

September 24th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

I thought it would be kind of fun, and hopefully informative, to write a piece about my likes and gripes regarding the business of private money lending.  In other words, these are the things that tend to kick start my emotions and get me going.  There is a bit of free association going on here, as I allow one idea to lead to another and so on, allowing my emotions to carry the narrative–so these likes and gripes are in no particular order.  This is the first part in a multi-part series.

The trust deed system (particularly as it works in Oregon, Washington, and California) is a thing of great beauty!  It provides for order and procedure, eliminating subjectivity (except for in the event of a judicial foreclosure), nicely balancing the interests of the borrower/owner and those of all the lien holders involved with regard to a particular piece of real estate.  Most of the professional investors I know enjoy and appreciate the trust deed system and have a lot more good than bad to say about it.

Associated with this is another wonderful thing they call title insurance.  Title companies are the only businesses I know that provide insurance against the possibility of their own error.  Knowing title companies as I do, I’m betting against them.  I will take title insurance every time AND THUS I shall be able to sleep at night.

Which brings me to the escrow service role of the title company:  This is a very tough job, high stress, with many people simultaneously placing multiple demands, and the need to consistently walk a tightrope avoiding costly problems and errors.  I most certainly wouldn’t want to do it.  And apparently most title people don’t either.  Most title companies do a poor job of training and preparing their people and setting a high standard, and thus unfortunately, most escrow services offered by title companies stink.  Fortunately there are exceptions.  Unfortunately, we often don’t have any control over where a particular closing is going to take place.

Now don’t even get me started on loan brokers.  I have often heard that 10% of realtors do 90% of the sales—and I suspect that the numbers are even more extreme with regard to loan brokers.  A good loan broker is worth her weight in gold—and there are some good ones out there—but there are … oh so many sadly disappointing loan brokers.  Still, we need loan brokers so we soldier on.  I figure our loans at Fairfield are about 50%/50%, with half coming to us through loan brokers and the rest coming directly from the borrowers.  The problems in my experience are not so much with honesty (though this certainly can be a problem from time to time), but with matters of basic business professionalism in general and with the specific knowledge of the business in particular.  Of course, it is a big step for many loan brokers to move into the realm of private money and commercial lending, but my company works hard to provide assistance, education, and support; we spend extraordinary amounts of time working to educate brokers.  At the end of the day, only a few seem to stick.  I think the problem in this field is one of barriers to entry; just about anyone can take a little test (and I mean little) and become a loan broker and that is probably not a good thing.

Okay, now that you’ve got me going:  I am downright angry at banks for not lending money on real estate secured loans any more.  “Come on banks, lend money!  That’s what you do for a living isn’t it?”  We in the private money sector need banks.  We lend money to help generally strong borrowers get from point A to point B, and point B is frequently a bank loan (or a buyer who needs a bank loan in order to be a buyer).  This needs to change.  There are plenty of good safe loans for banks out there that don’t require the banks to disregard every rule of good lending (as they did with many sub-prime loans leading up the collapse in fall of 2007).  It reminds me of something Mark Twain said (and I’m paraphrasing).  He said that if a cat sits on a hot burner it will never sit on a hot burner again.  But then it won’t sit on a cold burner again either.

I love my attorney.  It took me years to find a guy like this.  Everything that you have ever heard that can be bad about attorneys: the opposite is true about my guy.  He is honest, pragmatic, honorable, and fair.  He knows his limitations—and will be the first to tell you when he comes up against them–but at the same time has a vast breadth of knowledge regarding real estate matters and business in general.  And he doesn’t start a clock every time he picks up the phone or answers an e-mail.  Believe it or not, he actually seems to charge for “real work:” research and document preparation and such.  (And on top of all that, he’s the kind of guy you’d want to have a beer with.)  If you want me to put you in contact with him, I will.

And speaking of lawyers, I have to say that I really enjoyed Happy Hour is for Amateurs, by Philadelphia Lawyer.  If you are offended by explicit talk of sex, drugs, and binge drinking, you may want to give it a miss.  But beyond the raucous tales, this book takes you right into the bowels of the enormous billing machine that is “the law firm in America.”  This book takes what we thought we already knew and knocks us right upside the head with it.  It turns out we knew nothing at all.

End of part I

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Twenty-five questions you must ask

September 15th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

I’m going to make a list today of twenty-five important questions that I believe an investor must ask prior to funding any private money loan transaction.  I’m not going to elaborate much on each particular item here, but will drill down on each of the individual items in future posts.  For the sake of simplifying this discussion to a reasonable level, I’d like to start with several assumptions: (1) we are only talking about loans secured by real property, (2) we are only talking about first position loans, and (3) we are not talking about land development or raw land loans.  (Each of these exceptions, if removed, would be good for another whole list of special questions; we’ll save those particular scenarios for future discussion.)

(1) What is the Loan to Value (LTV) ratio of the loan you are considering and how does that fit with your own risk limits regarding this particular loan and property type?

(2) If this is a value-added loan (construction, rehab, or development), what is the front-end LTV?  Font-end LTV refers to the LTV immediately after the close of escrow but prior to any construction/development or disbursement of construction holdback funds.  (I generally reference this as FLTV, and it is understood that LTV, for a project actually refers to the LTV upon completion of the construction/development and full disbursement of any/all hold-back funds.)

(3) How confident are you of the value?  The “L” part in LTV is easy.  It is the “V” part that can be quite difficult to accurately determine, and in fact it must be understood that any such determination (no matter how good) is only an estimate.

(4) What are the recent market trends for the area in which the property is located?  Given the real estate market of the past two years, this question is particularly relevant.

(5) How is the borrower’s credit?  What is the mid-score, what are the issues, if any, and what is the trend?

(6) If the loan is a refi: how is the borrower’s pay history on the existing loan?

(7) How much “skin” will the borrower have in the game at the close of escrow?  In other words, how much cash or additional collateral is the borrower bringing to the table?

(8) If this is a real estate development or investment loan or a loan to a business owner occupying his own property: what is the relevant experience and background of this borrower?

(9) What is the purpose of the loan and how will the funds be utilized?

(10) What is the term of the loan?

(11) Can the borrower afford to make payments OR does the loan scenario otherwise involve an adequate interest reserve?

(12) What is the borrower’s plan/exit strategy, and how likely is the borrower of success?

(13) What is the borrower’s net worth and how liquid are the borrower’s assets?

(14) If there are one or more structures on the property, will you be listed as loss payee on a hazard insurance policy at the close of escrow (or prior to the beginning of construction if new construction is being funded)?

(15) If there is a construction hold-back, who is administering this and do you trust them to do so effectively?

(16) Have you reviewed the operative preliminary title insurance policy and approved any liens that your title insurance policy will be listing as exceptions to your position?

(17) Is your loan compliant with all state and federal disclosure and usury laws?

(18) Will all taxes be paid current at closing?

(19) What is the likelihood that there are any serious hazardous waste issues associated with the property?

(20) What is the likelihood that there are any wetland issues associated with the property?

(21) If relevant: what is the status of all required permits, entitlements, or other government approvals?

(22) What is the likelihood of one or more construction labor/materials liens taking precedent over your lien position?

(23) Does the loan size/amount, location, type etc. allow you to obtain optimal diversification?

(24) What is your plan for servicing the loan?

(25) If the loan involves a fractional interest, how comfortable are you joining with the other lenders involved in the loan?

So that’s my list for now.  There is nothing special about the number twenty-five, and I may well have left off some very important items, so please provide feedback as to which items you agree with, which ones you don’t, and what other items you might feel absolutely must be on a list of this sort.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Resources – where is all the good stuff?

August 30th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

As I continue my search for resources that might be useful to those who invest in real estate secured loans, I become increasingly convinced that our particular niche field is somewhat of an intellectual/informational wasteland.  Every time I stumble upon an article or site that looks like it might be of interest, it turns out to be a blatant plug for some specific product or company.  And the stuff that isn’t blatantly biased, quite often seems to be hack work, badly lacking in quality and perspective.  It would be as though I were searching for articles and blogs on gourmet food only to find that all of them had been written by employees of McDonald’s, Burger King, and Taco Bell.  (Hopefully I won’t get sued for this.  I did not mean to disparage the great corporate food powers in any way, shape, or form.)  My real point is: if I see one more article entitled “Hard Money Made EZ” or if I see “hard money” refereed to as “hard $$$” one more time, I’m outa here.

Moving on, I turned up a few items of interest in my lap around the internet this morning.  The following article is quite dated, but still might be of interest for those looking to expand geographically (and into a very large target market).

http://www.danwei.org/front_page_of_the_day/private_money_lending_business.php

I also stumbled onto this site/book by Paul Wells who claims to hold the secrets of private money.  I hope indeed he does, as we could use a good text book in this field.  I have asked him for a review copy, and if he is obliged to comply with my request, I will make a point to read/review it here.

http://www.paulwellsauthor.com/mortgageinvesting.html

I couldn’t help but be amused by this post by Leonard Rosen in August of 2007.

“America’s hard money expert shares his views on real estate investing. There are many different types of investing strategies that are available to the novice and sophisticated investor.

However, I do not know a safer investment strategy coupled with a higher rate of return than real estate. Unlike the equity markets, real estate has proven to be a safe haven for many investors. Over the past 40 years, real estate has risen in value in literally every major market in the United States.”

Oh well.  The full text is here:

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/35089

And here is another book on the topic, specific to California (but that is a pretty good starting point for talking about the basics of private money lending nationwide), and with five of five stars on five reviews.  I can’t figure out how to ask for a free review copy, so if anyone knows the book please weigh in here.

http://www.amazon.com/Smart-Trust-Deed-Investment-California/dp/0934581010

About.com defines private money pretty much the same way as most outsiders do:

http://www.answers.com/topic/hard-money-loan

At least they hedge the “last resort” part with the “short-term bridge” bit.  However, I am beside myself with how many people who should know better claim–I see this over and over again–that the borrower (credit/income/net worth and such) is irrelevant to the private money lending process.  Why would anyone make a private money loan and disregard readily available information about the financial status of the borrower?  It is beyond me.

Please oh please … if you know where the goodies are hiding out there, please share them with the rest of us.  That after all is what this blog is all about: sharing quality information and resources with like-minded folks who care about private money investing.  (Oh yes:  and promoting me and my company; but NOT BLATANTLY MIND YOU … good lord no … not blatantly.)

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Private Money – The Rules of Physics May Not Apply

August 22nd, 2009

Clay Sparkman

I would like to make a proposal.  I would like to propose that the standard universal laws don’t necessarily apply to private money lending.  That is, the things which we most take for granted—or assume to be true–may not be true in the realm of private money lending.

Let’s talk about systems for a moment.  Let’s take physics as an example.  Physics is the scientific mechanism which man has devised for describing, conceptualizing and predicting the behavior of the physical world.  In the realm of physics, if one rule or one aspect of the system is called into question—even a small matter—then the entire system must be called into question.  This has happened on various occasions as the science of physics has evolved, and as you can well imagine, it has caused quite a fuss among those who study physics.

My goal here is to break your notion that the things which you “know to be true” in the realm of private money lending can be correctly assumed to be true.  Let’s start with something absolutely fundamental.  Everyone agrees that there is a direct relationship between the perceived risk of loss of investment capital associated with a particular investment and the rate of return from that investment.  And I think it would be fair to say that pretty much everyone in the field agrees (1) that private money loans are riskier than their institutional counterparts (hereinafter referred to as institutional loans, a category to include conventional loans, sub-prime loans, and everything not included in the category of private money) and thus carry higher interest rates, and (2) that within the private money realm, riskier loans carry higher interest rates than those which are perceived to be less risky.  I would be quite surprised if any of my readers take issue with either of these two basic notions.  Let me clarify one more time because this is important: when I speak of risk here, I am referring to the risk of direct monetary loss of investment capital.

So let me now proceed to turn these two basic notions upside down.  Fundamental notion #1 suggests that private money loans are riskier than institutional loans and that this is the reason why they carry higher interest rates.  This is quite simply wrong.  Institutional lenders don’t avoid risky loans per say.  In fact, the sub-prime realm tends to thrive on them.  Institutional lenders can (and do) factor known risk into their lending process.  What institutional lenders will not tolerate is this: they will not tolerate loans which cannot be analyzed or characterized within a specific manageable and objective framework.  Put another way, institutional lenders are only interested in commodity loans—as opposed, let’s say, to custom loans.

And why is this true?  It is true because institutional lenders choose to manage risk and this can only be done effectively within a commodity loan system.  Even though these lenders can accommodate almost any degree of risk, they cannot–and will not–accommodate unknown risk.  All risk must be measurable, and risk—to say it another way–is only measurable within a specific manageable and objective framework.  Using FICO scores and other specific measures, the typical institutional lender can predict to within a dime the value of their loan portfolios that will go bad.  So you see, by managing risk, in effect they eliminate risk.  Any given loan involves a certain amount of risk, but a portfolio of commodity loans is utterly predictable.

In case you’re not buying this particular line of logic, and you think that I’m just working with smoke and mirrors here, let me offer some (fairly) objective data.  At Fairfield Financial, we manage a portfolio of 200+ private money loans at any given time, a package that adds up to about $30 million dollars in face value.  Our average mid-score for that package is between 650 and 660.  That portfolio sees an average of 2 loans per year go to REO.  That is a 1% default rate.  Those are good figures: 650-660 mid scores and 1% default rate.  I suspect that many institutional lenders would rather enjoy such numbers.  And thus, it seems that our loans are not necessarily more risky—or even as risky—as their institutional counterpart.  Then of course then our rates must be on par with the institutional realm as well, yes?  No.  Our median interest rate is 13% (fixed).

Okay fine.  Certain irregularities occur in the risk-reward relationship when crossing from the institutional money realm to the realm of private money.  But surely we can say—with complete confidence–that within the realm of private money, riskier loans carry a higher rate of interest than those perceived to be less risky.  Here again, I would respectively suggest: it just aint so!

Private money lenders are averse to risk–as are all investors.  However, private money lenders on the whole are particularly averse to risk of default (as opposed to risk of loss).  Risk of default involves (a) temporary cash flow interruptions (something we affectionately refer to as “cashflowus interuptus”), (b) lying awake at nights and worrying about non-performing or sporadically-performing loans (which we call “bad boys”), and (c) lots of hassles and many hours of work (which tend to accompany the bad boys).

In fact, I would assert that on the whole private money lenders are less averse to risk of long-term potential loss then they are to risk of default, which we shall refer to hereafter as the “bad boy problems.”  I have spent the past 15 years of my life pricing private money loans and have a pretty good idea of how the market works.  Pricing private money loans is a little like pricing antiques but tougher; it is a highly subjective process.  But of course there are certain guidelines.  One takes a hard look at the long-term risk of the loan and at the potential for bad boy problems.  I would argue that the best indicator of long-term risk is LTV.  Bad boy problem indicators (such as credit, income, and pay history) may play into the risk equation, but as any private money lender will tell you, they are betting on the equity first and the borrower second—and in fact the borrower is a distant second.  Having established LTV as a risk indicator, let’s look for a bad boy indicator.  Let’s go with FICO mid-score.  I have found that FICO mid-score is indeed a very reliable indicator of the likelihood that you will have a bad boy on your hands.  When it comes to financial responsibility/performance, it seems that the past is a very good predictor of the future.

So now we have two objective scales to work with: LTV and FICO mid-score.  Here I’m going to take a giant leap (very unscientific, but also very interesting) and make the assumption that these two scales are basically linear.  The LTV scale for private money loans basically runs from 0% to 75%.  The FICO mid-score scale runs from 300 to 850.  So that now we have established a ratio of 7.33 between the two scales ([850-300]/75).  Thus we can say that a 10% change in LTV on the risk scale is roughly proportionate to a change of 73 in FICO mid-score on the bad boy scale.

If risk is the primary factor driving interest rate, then a 75% LTV loan to a borrower with a 700 mid-score would carry a higher interest rate than a 55% LTV loan to a borrower with a 554 mid-score.  Well, in fact just the opposite happens.  Equalizing for other factors, I would tend to price the first loan at 12-13% and the second loan at 14-15%.  So you see, long-term risk is a distant second to bad boy factors when pricing a private money loan.

Someone I respect immensely recently said that it is not what we don’t know that endangers us the most.  It is what we think we know but know incorrectly.

If you go away from this post knowing that the risk-reward relationship as applied to private money is a myth, then you have learned a little something.  If you lie awake tonight and wonder if things that go up in the private money universe really must come down—then that dare I say may qualify as an epiphany.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Learning How to Blog – Private Money Investing

August 16th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

Okay, here we go.  I’ve been fussing around with this software and reading books on blogging and thinking about how to do this just so so.  But I realize now that it’s kind of like running a class-5 rapid.  Ultimately you just have to do it.

Who am I?  My name is Clay Sparkman and I will be blogging to you on a regular basis about hard money investing.  I am the Vice President and part owner of Fairfield Financial.  I have been brokering and investing in private money loan transactions since 1992.  I hold an MBA degree from Portland State University and a BS in Economics and Computer Science from the University of Oregon.  If there is anything I have learned in my 17+ years in the private money investment field it is that there is a thirst out there for more high quality, well organized information regarding this type of investing.  Many people want to participate or get more involved, but don’t know where to go to learn about it.  To this day, I am personally astounded by the lack of quality resources on this topic.  So my goal with this blog is to help fill the void–to provide a quality forum in which interested parties can discuss and learn more about the many intricacies of private money or trust deed investing.

I’m not sure I even have a single chair filled yet in my forum, and so I may be listening to my own echo for awhile, but in case anyone is listening, I’d like to start by asking if anyone would be willing to share information regarding quality resources that already exist regarding private money investing.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)