Fairfield Financial Services, Inc. - Private Money Loans, Lending & Borrowing

Private Money Source Investor Blog

Private Money FAQ

February 28th, 2010

Clay Sparkman

I realized early on that one of my greatest challenges in the private money lending business was to educate brokers, borrowers, and ultimately lenders regarding private money lending–what it is and when and how and when it should be used.  So many people know so little about it, and those who think they know quite often embrace vastly inaccurate ideas and misunderstandings.

It is quite amusing to watch people’s eyes glaze over when they ask me what I do at a cocktail party.  Usually that conversation doesn’t last very long.    People who aren’t interest are very uninterested.  However, people who are interested–and they are certainly the minority, this is a niche area after all–are immensely interested and seem to be insatiable.  I often have to terminate conversations with potential borrowers, brokers, and investors after an hour or so and suggest that we get back to it and cover the material over a series of one or more future conversations.

Moving on, I decided that it was one of my missions in life to educate agents and potential users of private money.  16 years later, I don’t know how much progress I have made, but I keep on trying.  Certainly that is what this blog is about.

I thought it might be informative to duplicate here the FAQ that I publish on my company website.  Keep in mind that it is directed primarily toward brokers and borrowers, though much of the information will be of interest to investors and potential investors.  And also note that it is about private money mostly, but does discuss the topic from a Fairfield-centric point of view.

At any rate, I hope you get something out of it.

Private money FAQ

Private money is often misunderstood. Many industry professionals know very little about it, and fallacies and misconceptions tend to dominate the collective wisdom.

What is private money used for?

Private money is generally used as a bridge: a way to get from point A to point B. It is generally a short to medium term solution (1-6 years), and there is nearly always an exit strategy going in. It is used for all types of real estate secured financing: commercial retail, restaurants, hotels/motels, marinas, elder care facilities, industrial, agricultural, raw land, land development, construction, rehab, multi-family, single family homes, manufactured homes, and floating homes. For a list of our loan programs, click here.

What are the interest rates?

Private money rates generally range from 10 to 15%. The rate is determined by looking at a combination of factors: (a) LTV ratio, (b) strength of borrower, (c) condition/desirability of property, (d) actual cash-in or real equity contributed by borrower. Typically our rates fall in the 12-13% range. A list of our loan guidelines may be found here.

What fees are involved?

We generally charge a loan fee equal to 5% of the gross amount of the loan. We also charge a doc prep fee ($500 or more, depending on the size of the loan), a property inspection fee ($650 or more, depending on the location of the property), and a collection account setup fee which is based on the size of the loan. There are no hidden junk fees.

Can the fees be paid from the proceeds of the loan?

Yes, if there is enough equity in the project. This is frequently the case.

Is there a pre-payment penalty?

We generally don’t have a pre-payment fee but occasionally we have a 3-6 month minimum interest clause minimum interest clause for our loans. For instance, it means that if a borrower repays a loan in 3 months or more, there is no penalty. If the borrower repays the loan, for example in 2 months, then the borrower will have to pay an extra month’s interest out of escrow at closing.

Why would anyone pay those kinds of rates and fees for a loan?

There are many reasons why a borrower would choose to use private money over a cheaper institutional option. For example, professional real estate investors like to use private money when buying because they are able to make offers which are not constrained by long time lines and numerous rigid conditions. Often times speed is a very significant factor in completing a profitable transaction and in those cases it often makes sense to pay for a short-term private money option rather than loose the deal. Frequently the condition of a property won’t allow for the initial financing with conventional money, and in those cases private money may be used. Often the type of property is a factor: banks don’t like lending on raw land and lots, but private money lenders are more inclined to do so. Cash leverage is another factor. Fairfield Financial, for example, loans based on the true value of a property, not the purchase price, so sometimes we lend 100% of the total acquisition cost for a property. The structure of the deal may be a factor. Most private money lenders allow the buyer to establish their equity through the mechanism of a seller carry back; banks won’t do this. The list goes on and on.

What is the most common use for private money?

Our most common loans are probably construction, rehab, and land development loans. We have an entire FAQ devoted to these loans: see the Rehab and Construction Loan FAQ.

We have been known to close loans in a matter of a week, but more typically, you should figure on 2-3 weeks. (Keep in mind that it is only possible for us to move quickly if the borrower, broker and other third parties are moving quickly as well.)

Is an appraisal required?

Some private money lenders require them. We don’t. Evidence of value is a critical part of the private money loan process. However, it is our opinion that a good set of comps is just as effective in establishing value as a good appraisal. Many of our borrowers are professional investors, and we feel that they are qualified to perform the value analysis. This allows us to streamline the process. However, it is important to note that putting together a god set of comps is hard work. See this article on our website for a detailed description of how to prepare a proper value analysis.

As a mainstream mortgage broker, I don’t see much of this type of thing. Why should I be interested in private money?

To be perfectly frank, it is my belief that mainstream mortgage brokers are being squeezed out of the industry. Lenders are ramping up their operations to better provide online loan sourcing directly to borrowers. We saw a similar thing in the travel industry over the past years. The travel agents that have survived, and even thrived, are the ones who effectively established niches within the industry. It is my belief that the same will be true for mortgage brokers. Plain vanilla loans can be easily processed in an assembly line fashion which easily translates to the world of the novice and a web browser. Niche lending, on the other hand, tends to be a hand-crafting of sorts, and cannot be easily automated. Look at private money. There are no absolute rules. Many factors must be considered in making a decision and frequently those factors are intangible. Ultimately a high degree of thought work and common sense is involved. Private money will always be a people process. So if you tell me, “I am not interested in private money because I don’t do unusual loans,” I say to you, “You might want to reconsider.”

As a mortgage broker bringing you this transaction, how do I get paid?

It is simple. You bring us a borrower. We price the loan to you. (Think of yourself as a wholesale buyer.) You price the loan to your client, adding your fees as appropriate. You stay involved in the loan (or not) as you choose, and prior to closing, you submit a fee demand to escrow and receive a check directly from the title company. For more information on this topic, Click Here.

Why do they call it “hard money”?

It is difficult to find an answer to this question. I’ve heard plenty of speculation. Some people say that it’s because the money is used for “hard to do” loans. Others say it is because the loans are “hard to get” or “hard to pay.” It is my belief that it is called hard money because traditionally it has been “real money” in the sense that it is not borrowed. Institutions loan borrowed money, and in this sense they loan “soft money.” However, I must point out that things have changed a bit over the years, and these days a good deal of hard money is in fact borrowed. (I would guess as much as 50%.)

How do I go about doing a private money loan with Fairfield Financial?

There are basically four steps.

  1. First, run the concept by us. You may call and discuss the loan with us, or you may e-mail a summary, or you may use our online loan submission engine, which will walk you through the process. If we like the project concept and feel that the numbers are acceptable, we proceed to the next step.
  2. We review a complete loan packet. We ask that this be sent via overnight mail or delivered to the office (fax copy is not acceptable).
  3. If all this checks out, we ask the borrower for a deposit (generally $1,000 to $3,000). This should be in the form of a cashier’s check or money order. If requested, we provide a conditional loan commitment letter at this time.
  4. If the property checks out, we draw up the documents and close the loan through escrow.

Is the deposit check refundable?

If we close the loan through escrow, the deposit is applied as a credit to the loan fees. If we don’t close the loan because (a) the borrower does not or cannot perform or (b) facts or parameters of the loan are significantly different than as represented, we keep the deposit to reimburse us for our costs. Otherwise, if Fairfield fails to perform for any reason, we return the deposit to the borrower.

How does the construction money get disbursed?

From time to time, as a borrower completes the construction of a project, the borrower will submit a draw request to Fairfield Financial. Fairfield will review this request and, upon approval, release funds either directly to the subs/suppliers (if requested to do so) or to the borrower (if the borrower has already paid the subs/suppliers). Fairfield is responsible for ensuring that (a) the work is completed to an appropriate quality standard (this may require an on-site inspection which will incur a fee specified in the Loan Agreement), (b) the project is on-budget (or if not on-budget, appropriate adjustments are made), and (c) that all subs and suppliers get paid for their work on the project.

What needs to be included in a private money loan package?

A private money loan packet is generally fairly straightforward. For a list of our packaging guidelines, please Click Here

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Is Oregon next?

February 18th, 2010

Clay Sparkman

After many years of holding relatively firm, the real estate market in the Pacific Northwest may be in trouble.  The following informative piece was printed yesterday at Business Insider.  Make sure to follow the “Check out how bad Oregon has become” link and the 14 slides that accompany the article.

http://www.businessinsider.com/oregons-expanding-foreclosure-rate-could-make-it-the-next-california-2010-2

What does this mean for Oregon and Washington?  How bad is it going to get before it gets better?  And what does this mean for the rest of the nation?  Please take a minute to share your opinions by clicking on the comments link for this site.

Keep in mind that this analysis is looking at residential properties only.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Top ten clues that you should probably pass on a particular loan offering

February 14th, 2010

Clay Sparkman

I thought it would be nice to publish something just for fun today.  I rather enjoy doing these TOP TEN lists, but I try to avoid doing them very often for fear that it will look like this blog is purely for my own self-amusement.  And of course to a certain extent this is true—but I wouldn’t want to give you that impression.

Drum roll please…

Top ten clues that you should probably pass on a particular loan offering:

10. The borrower looks uncannily like the young Al Pacino.  (Think Scarface.)

9. The loan packet looks like it has been through a war–beat-up, dog-eared, and coffee stained, and you detect the faint smell of urine.

8. The borrower describes his take-out strategy as, “win lottery.”

7. Worse yet: the borrower describes his take-out strategy as, “bank loan.”

6. The property exists in a different dimension and therefore cannot actually be inspected without passing though a seam in the universe.  (Think of the title problems alone: survey, easements, etc.)

5. The property is located in the near-bankrupt third-world state of California.

4. The property is located on the tropical Island of Cuba, but it is located on US territory.  Uh, yes: there is a spectacular bay view.

3. The use of funds section reads, “…to complete the design and manufacture of an advanced metallic protective hat which will deflect all external thought transitions to my brain and at the same time keep all my thoughts from escaping.”

2.  The borrower is a self-proclaimed Solo Performance Art Specialist who cannot afford to make regular interest payments but commits to make “equivalent value payments” in live regular performances on your front lawn.

1. There is an exception on title which requires that a Chihuahua named Gertrude maintain a perpetual right to fully occupy and utilize the property for the duration of her existence.  (I guess this isn’t an automatic dis-qualifier.  You might want to meet Gertrude before finalizing your position.)

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Ten crucial steps in reading an appraisal

February 3rd, 2010

Clay Sparkman

The crucial thing that you must understand about any appraisal (or other real estate valuation instrument) is that it is only as good as its logic.  So that—in other words—you must never accept an appraisal’s conclusion regarding value without looking beyond the surface to understand the logic that leads to the conclusion and without making some reasonable determination as to the quality of the logical argumentation.

With that in mind, I offer you ten critical steps to follow when reading/analyzing (and thus attempting to assess the “goodness” of) an appraisal.

(1)    The very first thing you must ask as you analyze an appraisal is to what degree is the appraisal transparent?  In other words, how much of the logic leading to the value conclusion is on display for you the reader?  If the answer is none, the appraisal is useless.  Throw it away.  If the answer is some (in other words there are gaps in the logic) then you must either (a) once again, decide to toss the appraisal, (b) decide to accept some degree of uncertainty, (c) attempt to fill the gaps on your own, or (d) contact the appraiser and see if she can provide the missing logic.  (Sometimes the appraiser will have the information you need on file, but they just didn’t include it in their final report.)  Ideally the answer is none or very little, and the appraisal can be said to be highly transparent.  At any rate, you will need to be asking this question throughout your analysis.

(2)    The next thing you need to do is get a handle on what is being appraised.  Is it a home, a commercial building, a parcel of land?  What are the basic specifications?  Where is it located?  Is it urban or rural?  How desirable is the surrounding area?  Are there functional inadequacies?  If it is land, what horizontal infrastructure is in place or lacking and what does the current zoning allow?

(3)    I have never heard anyone else say this, but I stand by it (at least when valuing buildings and structures; for valuing land, not so much): one of the first things I do after getting a basic sense of the property is go straight to the photos.  (And by the way, make sure you have an original appraisal or color copies.  The photos can be quite useful, but not if they are blacked out by copying and faxing.)  I study the photos of the subject property and then I compare them to the photos of each of the various comps.  You will be surprised at how often you will begin to sniff some bad cheese at this point in the process (particularly when dealing with structures).  What you are looking for here is: (a) whether or not the comps in the same general condition as the subject property, and (b) whether or not the comps are in the same general “class” as the subject property.  By class I am referring to the level of quality and distinction of the property.  If the answer to one or both of these is no, it is not necessarily game over, but you will now be looking even more closely at the adjustment matrix later on to see if the apparent differences are effectively accounted for to your satisfaction.

(4)    Next, you will want to check the effective date of the value given.  How current is the appraisal?  In a steady up economy we used to be comfortable using appraisals that were as much as 1-2 years old.  We would adjust the value to be in-line with changes in the market.  With the chaos of the past (nearly) 3 years, this is much more difficult.  Generally speaking (though this would depend to a certain extent on regional are) you would want your appraisal to be less than 6 months old.

(5)    Check carefully to see if there are any “subject to” items associated with the value.  Generally this will initially be indicated by checking a box that indicates the appraised value is subject to certain additions, improvements, or modifications as indicated later in the appraisal.  This of course is a critical item, so make sure you have read through the entire body of the appraisal so as not to miss any such “subject to” items or conditions.

(6)    Look to see if any extraordinary assumptions are made by the appraiser.  Here again, you will be forced to read through the entire body of the appraisal to be sure.  On more than a few occasions I have seen what looked to be a perfectly reasonable appraisal completely neutralized (or actually nullified) at the discovery of one or more extraordinary assumptions.  The problem with most extraordinary assumptions is that they are indeed extraordinary.  If I am evaluating a parcel of bare land zoned rural agricultural, and an extraordinary assumption in my appraisal states that “The zoning will be changed to allow multi-unit residential at 8 units per acre.” … well chances are, the gig is up.  Even if some serious local zoning change is in the works, what is the chance that you can count on it to come through and turn this “straw” property into gold?

(7)    Take an accounting of the methods utilized for valuing the subject property.  In my opinion, a market sales comparison approach is ALWAYS essential and should be the primary method—and the one given most weight—in valuing a property.  The only true value anything has in a  market economy is the amount that others are willing to pay for it, and thus the attempt to estimate market value by looking at recent sales—though still at best a process of estimation—is the only method we have that goes to the heart of the matter.  Beyond that, it would be nice to have a cost approach and an income approach (where relevant) but these are, in my opinion, at best a good way to cross-check the market value derived by the appraiser.

(8)    Another thing you need to take a close look at is the aging of the comps.  If all the comps were sold quite recently, then you are good in this department.  But if one or more of the comps are more than 6 months old, this may be a problem.  The next step would be to look at the comp matrix to see how much the appraiser adjusts the target value to factor comp aging.  If one or more of the comps are listings … well then, these aren’t really comps at all.  I have seen comp workups using nothing but listings.  This is totally unacceptable. Anyone can list a property for any price they want.  It would perhaps be reasonable to have 1-2 listings along with at least as many “true” comps, but even this is getting into squishy territory.  So here again, you would have to look at how the appraiser adjusted the subject value based on the “listing” comps.

(9)    You should spend the majority of your effort fussing over the comp matrix.  This is the matrix which compares various characteristics of the subject property with various characteristics of the comps and makes specific adjustments for each of the comps to arrive at adjusted values for the comps (effectively attempting to monetarily “convert” each of the comps into the subject property).  If you have: (a) many adjustments, (b) large adjustments (relative to the price of the property), and/or many seemingly subjective adjustments, then you may want to seriously question the integrity of the appraisal.  You will want to walk through each and every adjustment, and here again, you must look for transparency.  Does the appraiser explain the logic behind his adjustment decisions?  If not, you have a transparency problem.  At the end of the day, you must be comfortable with the adjustments and you must feel that they are objective, transparent, well thought out, and seemingly reasonable.  If not, you must either (a) discard the appraisal, (b) contact the appraiser for further explanation, and/or (c) revise one or  more adjustments and revise the final subject value accordingly.

(10) And finally you will want to be sure and take a look at other methods of valuation utilized (generally income and cost on commercial appraisals).  And then you will want to determine how the appraiser has gone about reconciling the different values arrived at utilizing different methods.  Sometimes a weighted value approach is used.  If so, how much weight is being given to the comp value approach relative to other methods utilized.  As you may have guessed by now, I generally like to see all or at least the vast majority of weight given to the comp analysis.  If the appraisal doesn’t explain the reconciliation, you have a transparency problem.  If the comp value approach is not given enough weight, you may want to fall back on the value arrived at by the comp value approach as your own final value.

And there you have it.  There is a great deal more that can be said about reading an appraisal, and certainly this list of ten items is far from exhaustive, but it does give you a few things that you will not want to overlook.  If anyone has their own favorite “crucial” steps we would love to hear about them.  Please let us know and we wills share them with the group.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909 or 800-971-1858)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

What exactly do you want me to do for you?

January 20th, 2010

Clay Sparkman

When evaluating loan requests, this is the fundamental question:  what exactly do you want me to do for you?  It is impossible to count the number of times that I have receive loan packets or proposals that didn’t include a loan summary or any clear description of the request.  The process of evaluating a loan must begin with a well prepared summary of the loan proposal.  (This item might be called a loan summary, an executive summary, or a cover sheet.  We call it a Prospectus.)   I don’t know why borrowers and brokers are so reluctant to provide such a fundamental item when attempting to secure private funding for real estate projects.  I suspect that it has to do with the way banks operate.  They don’t require a summary so why should we?  And beyond that, I think that many brokers and borrowers simply don’t know what to include in a summary.  One of the ways that we have gotten around the problem is by including a loan submission form on our website which walks the broker/borrower through a simple electronic form.  At least in the initial stages of the application process, this seems to provide much needed guidance.

Ultimately, however, we will not accept a loan packet or submission which is not accompanied by an adequate summary, and if the summary is quite good, we will probably tend to be much more receptive to at least considering the loan proposal at hand.  For today’s post, I am including a sample of a prospectus (redacted) that we prepared for submission to our private money investors.  We actually place our prospectus on top of all the relevant documentation, data, photos, etc., scan it into Adobe, and then e-mail a link and password to our interested investors, so that they may review the loan proposal in its entirety.  Here then is what we consider to be a well informed prospectus.  I recommend that all private money investors insist on adequate documentation and don’t settle for less.

Clay Sparkman

Fairfield Financial Services, Inc

2727 NE Hoyt St, Portland, OR 97232

Phone (503)476-2909, e-mail clay@privatemoneysource.com

REAL ESTATE PROSPECTUS

SECURED LOAN

Purchase and rehab on 4-plex in Las Vegas, Nevada

Loan Details

  1. Loan Amount: $130,000
  2. Term: 2 yr
  3. Interest Rate: 13%
  4. Monthly Payments: $1,408.33 Interest Only
  5. Construction Holdback Account: $54,750
  6. Security:  Deed of Trust in 1st Position security interest in real property at xxxx Bassler Street, North Las Vegas, NV 89030
  7. Completion Value by Borrower Estimate / Comps is $220,000
  8. Completion Value LTV by Borrower Estimate / Comps is 59%
  9. Conservative Completion Value is $195,000
  10. Conservative Completion Value LTV is 67%

Loan Overview

This is a purchase and rehab construction loan for a 4-plex in Las Vegas, NV.  The property will be purchased as a bank REO for $78,000.  The borrower (hereafter referred to Flip Guy for the purpose of this sample) is bringing $13,000 to escrow in order to demonstrate some cash investment on his part, and requesting $54,750 to complete the construction on the property.  Flip is experienced flipping homes in Las Vegas, and has rehabbed over 200 properties in this area.  He currently holds 62 properties in his inventory.  42 of these homes are free and clear and all but 5 of his properties are rented and producing income.  Flip reports that these 5 properties are for sale.

Flip Guy has successfully completed four loans with Fairfield over this past year and a half.  In each of these loans the construction was completed and the properties were listed in under a month.  Both houses were sold and the loans paid in full well before the loans matured and Flip has never been late with a payment.  Before and after photos of two of these properties are provided as an example of his work.  In addition, Flip has provided before and after photos of a similar 4-plex that was not financed through Fairfield.

In each of Flip’s previous loans, his exit strategy was to sell the properties.  For this loan, he intends to refinance the property and hold it as a rental.  To be safe, he has requested a 2 year term, although he anticipates that he will be able to exit this loan in approximately year.  He will pursue a take-out loan as soon as the rehab is completed, which should take 1-2 months.  Flip will hold title to this property under his company, xxx, LLC, and he will personally guarantee this loan.

Property

The subject property is 3040 SF and has 4 units, each with 2 bedrooms and 1 bath.  The 4-plex was built in 1963 and sits on a .21 acre lot.  The 4-plex is structurally sound, but is in need of cosmetic repairs.  Flip plans to update and modernize each unit of this house.  He will replace the flooring, paint, update the kitchen, and landscape the property to add curb appeal.

This property is approximately seven miles northeast of the Vegas strip and one block east of the Las Vegas Blvd.  It is located in a neighborhood that is primarily working class rentals.  There are three 4-plexes neighboring this property and they are all reported to be in good condition.

Valuation

Completion Value Comps by Borrower

To determine the completion Value, the borrower utilized 7 comps in a close proximity to the subject property that range from $209,900 to $249,900.  Three of these comps are sales, while the other four are current listings.  Three of these listings have sales pending, but those pending prices are unknown.  Based on these comps, Flip estimates that the property should be worth $220,000 once the repairs are made.

Analysis of Comps by Inspector

Based on the average price/unit of all comps and listings, the value of the subject property would be $224,408, which supports the borrower’s estimate of value.  However, when the average rent is broken down to a conservative price/SF, and multiplied by the average gross rent multiplier (see inspection report), a value of 194,803 is suggested.  In addition, if the average sale price/SF is multiplied by the size of the property, it yields a value of $193,982.  Based on these calculations, the inspector suggests that it would be reasonable to consider $195,000 as a conservative value for this property.

A field report is available for review.

Market Trends

Altosresearch.com is a website that provides real time market data for single family homes, and was used to evaluate the Las Vegas market trends.  Average home prices, time on the market, and the current home inventory are all considered in the evaluation of this property.

Average home prices have continued to fall over the past year, and the median home price as of Nov 29, 2009 is $119,928.  There appears to be a significant decrease in the rate of this fall over the past few months, and in the past 30 days prices appear to be relatively stable.  Seven day averages show a very slight increase.

The average time on the market in Las Vegas area has been steadily declining over the past 8 months, and has dropped from 175 days at the high point in April 2009 to a157 days as of Nov 29, 2009.

The current home inventory is one of the most important factors to consider.  A decreasing inventory is often a precursor to stabilizing market.  Since its high point in April 2009, the home inventory has decreased by approximately 20%.  There is a current downward trend in the home inventory which could potentially explain the decrease in the rate at which home prices have dropped over the past few months.

Market trend graphs are available for review.

Flip’s first loan, the Pinedale property, sold in just less than 5 months from the time of listing.  Flip’s second loan, The Ashbrook property, was sold in just less than 8 months from the time of listing.  His next two loans, the Bengal property and the Almondwood property, each sold in approximately 3 months after the property was listed.

His average turn time is compatible with the expectations based on current market trends.  The price point at which Flip purchases these homes, his ability to rehab them quickly, his realistic approach to time on market, and the decreasing home inventory, seem to support his business model.

Process

Las Vegas does not require any permits for the type of work that will be performed, nor do they require a contractor’s license.  The borrower will be ready to go as soon as the loan is funded and plans to have the house completed in approximately two weeks.

Income

We were provided with a signed 1003 for Flip Guy, which states a monthly income of $55,000, and a net worth of $5,245,000.  Flip states that his monthly income is a combination of the rental net income and proceeds from the properties that he flips.  A copy is provided here for your review

Credit

Flip Guy has a mid credit score 686.  This is typical for rehab developers who use bank cards for construction financing.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Won’t somebody please call a plumber … the banks are clogged

January 5th, 2010

Clay Sparkman

One of my dear good readers sent the following e-mail in response to my last post, Home strippers coming to a neighborhood near you.

“Good topic Clay.  Now forgetting about us private lenders, the conventional lenders continue to be their own worst enemies.  They persist in bringing the properties to the city hall steps at 40% over market.  When no one buys the property, they have it inspected and insured, pay the utilities, and pay a realtor to sell it for them at a discount.  On top of all that they may face the problem that your article addressed.

Pricing it to sell on the steps would solve their problems.

In early December, I looked at this piece of bank owned junk in St Helens, Oregon.  It was rough around the edges but the bones were good.  It was a typical Ranch style, 2-bath, 3-bed, 1400 sq ft, nice large lot, fenced, but no garage.  The bank had it listed for $198,000, but they had started out at $139,000 a couple of months earlier.  I called the agent and asked them if they had a misprint on the price (as there are nice, newer homes with garages going for $165k max).   The agent said no, it wasn’t a misprint; the lender had called him when it was at $139,000 and told him to boost the price to $198,000.  What is that about?

Until the banks get their head out, their balance sheets are going to continue to worsen.

Regards, Alan”

Well I can hardly say that it is the first time that I have heard of or seen this type of thing with the banks.  One does get the distinct feeling that these institutions are somehow unmotivated to remove the toxic assets from their books.

And it is even worse than all that.  As if they needed additional help at slowing down the corrective process:  The federal and state governments, with all of their efforts to keep owners in homes which they cannot afford, are seriously compounding the problem.  It could take an extra year or two to get many of these bad loans off the books due to the various federal and state requirements being imposed upon the banks.  (And that assumes the banks are motivated.)  The following NYT article does a nice job of discussing the matter.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/02/business/economy/02modify.html

And so even though a lot of good things are happening with our economy as of late, real estate prices will not correct until lending institutions provide adequate funding once again to owners and buyers—and the economy as a whole will remain at least partially broken until this occurs.

And so I say:  “Won’t somebody please call a plumber … the banks are clogged.”

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Home strippers coming to a neighborhood near you

December 29th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

Okay, so I was told that if I wanted to get more people to read my posts, I need to utilize attention grabbing headlines.  (How am I doing so far?)  Now I’d like to see a show of hands, and please be honest here, as this is purely for scientific purposes and the results will remain strictly private:  Was it the headline that caused you to click on the link to this blog-post (if so raise your hand) or was it merely your overwhelming and insatiable lust for all things private-money-lending related?  Uh huh … right okay … hey I believe you.

At any rate, I figured that this recent New York Times article would be of interest to any active private money and trust deed investors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/business/economy/23stripped.html

Fortunately, we haven’t seen too much of this sort of thing yet in our dealings at Fairfield.  But then we haven’t had to foreclose on loans in Arizona or Nevada and only have one in foreclosure in Florida and that particular loan is a land loan.  We’ve had a little trouble here and there, but nothing big.  Greg Brown—a favorite musician of mine—used to talk about how folk musicians were different from rock musicians.  He said that when folk musicians went on the road, there idea of trashing a hotel room was leaving the TV unplugged.  I am happy to say that most of our borrowers thus far have been more the folk-musician-type.  Let’s hope it stays that way.  We wouldn’t want home strippers coming to a neighborhood near you.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Trust deed lending – ten mistakes you should never make and ten mistakes you must never make

December 19th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

Okay, first the ten mistakes you should never make:

(1)    Never close a loan without title insurance.

(2)    Never close a loan on property that has valuable structures without a valid hazard insurance policy in effect listing you or your entity as loss payee.

(3)    Never close a loan leaving property taxes unpaid (unless you are fully aware of the amount of unpaid property taxes and have knowingly agreed to allow some amount to remain unpaid for a certain specified period of time).

(4)    Never lend on land which may have wetland issues without seeing a wetland study or speaking with a relevant government official, and understanding the potential impact of possible mitigation requirements.

(5)    Never lend on property for which labor and/or materials have been provided within 90 days prior to closing without either (a) having an extended ALTA policy of title insurance with no exception for labor and materials liens (difficult to get), or (b) having received a signed affidavit from the borrower which lists all providers used (along with contact info and the amount of any outstanding debt), and contacting all labor and materials providers on the list to make sure that none is preparing to file labor or materials liens.

(6)    Never close a loan secured by property which appears to show (by inspection, general observation, public record, or known history) a reasonable possibility of being contaminated by any form of hazardous waste, unless you have seen a current level I or level II environmental study showing the property to be clean.  And in any event, always require borrowers to sign a hazardous waste indemnity agreement.

(7)    On a construction, rehab, or development loan: never disburse funds for work that has not been completed (unless as a deposit to a company that has been carefully checked out and is considered to be highly credible) and never disburse funds directly to the borrower unless as reimbursement for work that has already been completed and paid for, and which is documented accordingly.

(8)    On a construction, rehab, or development loan: whenever advancing funds to a labor, service, or material provider, never advance such sums without first requiring the provider or entity to sign a form acknowledging that the money is an advance and that the advance was provided by the lender or otherwise a third party, and that any refund must go back to the lender or third party and never back to the borrower directly.

(9)     Never close a loan without reviewing every single exception allowed on title in positions superior to your own.

(10) Never close a raw land loan without first understanding precisely what is allowed by the applicable zoning and without speaking to appropriate government authorities to be sure that there are no known problems which may obstruct or deter any reasonable plans to develop the property.

Okay, now for the ten things that you really absolutely must never ever do:

(1)    You must never close a loan at a title company known as Joe’s First National Title located in a former burrito cart at the corner of 3rd and Main in Springfield.

(2)    You must never lend money on a property if you happen to catch your loan broker or borrower walking the property with a Geiger counter.

(3)    You must never lend money on a property in a country (or region) presided over by anyone named Hugo Chavez, Fidel (or Ramón) Castro, Kim Jong-Il, Jim Jones, Iddi Amin, Papa Doc, Baby Doc, or well … any Doc for that matter.

(4)    You must never make a loan secured by documents which are written in iambic pentameter verse.  Just back out the door, turn, and run as fast as you can.

(5)    You must never lend money to a non-human primate—except possibly a rhesus monkey (and then only if the monkey is a natural born US citizen).

(6)    You must never lend money on a property if when you ask about inspecting the property, the broker intones, “You can’t get there from here.”

(7)    You must never lend money on a property if the appraisal states that the property’s highest and best use is “ancient burial ground.”

(8)    Four words: tar pit never ever!

(9)    You must never make a loan where your trust deed will be in the thirty-seventh position.  Ah, ah, ah … don’t even think about it.  (I don’t care how good the CLTV is.)

(10) You must never lend on property which straddles the international dateline.  It is quite simply too confusing.

Okay, so hopefully it was clear to many of you that the first set of items was meant to be serious and that the second set was intended to make you laugh.  If not, don’t worry about it.  These are really all things that you shouldn’t do—funny or not.

Now, I am good at telling people what not to do, so if anyone asks, I’ll gladly crank out another ten not-to-do items (the serious ones that is) or if you would like for me to expand on any particular item on the first list, I will give that a shot as well.  Any comment would be good actually.  Hecklers are particularly welcome.  (So far, we have been a little light on conversation, so I still get excited about the daily spam that trickles in.  And yet not one to be easily discouraged, I take your silence as a kind of mesmerized reverence.  What else could it be?  Yes, that’s it.  Very good.  Now: at ease my good readers … at ease.)

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Commercial real estate tsunami?

December 6th, 2009

Clay Sparkman

There has been quite a bit of talk in 2009 about the possibility of a meltdown in the market for commercial real estate.  I came across some statistics recently that were quite astounding in support of the idea that a wave of commercial defaults is coming.  It is estimated, apparently, that there is currently 3 trillion in commercial real estate debt outstanding in the US.  According to this particular source (which I’m sorry to say I don’t recall), 1.3 trillion of that debt will come due within the next four years.  As we all know, there doesn’t appear to be much in the way of new commercial funding available for those current loan holders (or their potential buyers), so the above statistics—on the face of it–would tend to be worrisome.

Still, 4 years is a long way out.  I personally suspect that we will get a much better feel for what is likely to occur over the long haul by looking at what happens in 2010.  But I am not a prognosticator.  You’d think that with a degree in economics, I might have the ability–or at least the inclination–to analyze and predict long-term economic trends.  But I am not that kind of guy.  I am more of a “sure it works in practice, but does in work in theory” kind of guy.  I like the type of economics where you look at what happened and then play with the numbers and try to figure out why it happened that way.  Those familiar with Freakonomics and SuperFreakonomics by Levitt and Dubner will know what I am talking about.

I recall my first day in a big lecture hall at University of Oregon attending Macroeconomics 101.  I was a fresh faced kid eager to learn and ready to believe just about anything.  When the professor said something like this:  “Okay the fundamental assumption that we will make as economists is that people are rational and that they will behave in a rational manner,” it sounded fine to me at the time—perfectly reasonable.  I hadn’t been around long enough to believe otherwise.  It was only with the passing of years, after graduating from the university and going to work in the real world, that I began to question that assumption.  And ultimately I concluded that it was downright ridiculous.  My entire economics education was based on one fundamental and ridiculous idea. It would be as though we had utilized a chicken bone as the foundation for building a skyscraper.  (Needless to say, I was not happy when considering the amount of money I had spent obtaining this degree.)

A very good read which speaks to the matter is Predictably Irrational, by Dan Ariely.  The bad news, if you wish to draw conclusions from this book, is indeed that individuals often engage in irrational behavior.  However, the good news and the saving grace–I should think–if you are trying to understand human behavior in the aggregate, is that we are as it turns out quite predictable in our irrational behavior.

Where was I then?  Oh yes … my fundamental point is that I would rather not go too far down the road of attempting to predict the economic (or any other) future.  I will only go so far as to say that I’d rather it not happen.  But it is worth pointing out that a downturn such as that discussed may not be all bad for those who invest and traffic in private money loans.  If banks aren’t lending as 1.3 trillion in loans come due and with private money lenders as the primary option, the pickings would be quite impressive indeed for those who choose to keep investing.

So what do others have to say?  As per usual, there are a wide range of opinions.  And they tend to be somewhat polarized.  I myself tend to think that the doomsday people somewhat undermine themselves by being so certain and unrelenting, but at the same time, I am suspicious of anyone who says that things are looking good.  I figure the later must work the national association of realtors or some such thing.

I guess we’ll each have to decide for ourselves, and so here is a sampling of web content regarding the matter.

From the Dallas Morning News

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/columnists/chall/stories/DN-Hallcolumn_09bus.ART.State.Edition1.3cf46e6.html

From the Business Insider

http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-panzner-commercial-real-estate-2009-11

From the National Real Estate Investor

http://nreionline.com/property/retail/foreclosure_in_doubt/

From the Real Estate Channel

http://www.realestatechannel.com/us-markets/commercial-real-estate-1/national-association-of-realtors-lawrence-yun-nar-commercial-real-estate-index-commercial-real-estate-trends-2009-office-space-lease-office-space-sale-investment-1273.php

From the Urban Land Institute

http://www.uli.org/ResearchAndPublications/EmergingTrends/Americas.aspx

Okay, there is plenty more where that came from, but I won’t burden you with it here; if you wish to read it, you’ll have no trouble finding it.  I would be very interested, however, in hearing the views of those who follow this site.  We are still quite small in number, but we have enough folks to fill a good sized classroom now, so by all means, raise your hand and be heard.  Please: prognosticate.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Private money through the looking glass

November 22nd, 2009

Clay Sparkman

First off, I’d like to point you to a list of 37 private money investment tips posted by Brad Evans of Brad Evans Real Estate Loans.  This list has been circulating on the net for quite a few years now.  It is one of the more thoughtful comprehensive items that I have come across and so I thought I would share it with you.  Though I agree with a lot of what Brad has to say, I don’t agree with all of it.  I will utilize a future post to give my own input/comments on each of the points given on Brad’s list.

http://www.bradevans.com/37pointchecklist.html

For today’s post, I spent some time looking at You-tube videos that came up under a search of “private money lending”.  To the negative, as with content in general regarding private money investing, I didn’t (yet) find a whole lot of substance in these videos for the most part.  However, to the plus side, I have to say that I really had a good time with this.  There is some very interesting and entertaining stuff out there.  And I find it quite useful to see what people are saying about private money: how it works and how to obtain it in particular.  When I have more time I’m going to go much deeper as I just really scratched the surface.

At any rate, here is a representative cross section of what I found out there in cyber-video-landia.

On making massive montly income

Our narrator is a representative of http://www.askaexpertwholesaler.com/.  I went to the homepage but didn’t actually enter because you have to enter your e-mail address (and I wasn’t so inclined), but the entry page compels with the question, “Who Else Wants to Discover the Astonishing Secrets of How to Make Massive Monthly Income with Real Estate in 2008 By Asking an Expert Wholesaler”

This is one in a series of “quick tips” to real estate investors on how to find private money lenders

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-frYFdYJw4

My comment: It’s hard to argue with “run your mouth.”

The discovery of iced coffee

Patrick Riddle of http://www.privatemoneyblueprint.com on “How to Convert Wannabe REIs into Private Money Lenders.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2VfCnCgibM

My comment: I love this guy.  He has a bunch of videos out there and I wanted to watch every one of them.  He definitely has a certain charisma that keeps you watching.  Will his plan work?  Maybe one time in ten thousand, I suspect.  Most of the people who attend those meetings haven’t made their fortune yet—and don’t really have cash to invest.  And hey, that is just a tough road to go down anyway.  I don’t try to sell anyone on trust deed investing, but if I did, it certainly wouldn’t be the inexperienced, uneducated, and uninitiated.  There is too much to know before you can be ready for this kind of investing.  At any rate, I’m glad Patrick discovered iced coffee.

How to avoid talking to investors about the things you need to talk to investors about

Here is another one from Patrick Riddle at http://www.privatemoneyblueprint.com called “How to explain the “Worst Case Scenario” to a Private Money Lending Prospect.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps0Cv6QSC18

My comment: Okay, this one somewhat disturbs me.  It might be more appropriately titled, “How to avoid talking to investors about the things you need to talk to investors about.”  I do like his description of the workout process.  Basically:  You are a lender and then you become an owner and we all live happily ever after.  I guess he didn’t want to muck up the conversation with tedious details like how to choose between a judicial foreclosure and a non-judicial foreclosure, what happens if the borrower contests a judicial foreclosure, the potential impact of a bankruptcy, taking back a property that is distressed or an unfinished project, the potential impact of market changes and/or a protracted foreclosure process on your equity position, how to go about marketing the property, and how to obtain and collect on a deficiency judgment, if need be in order to fully recover.

Would you like to vacation in paradise?

This is Cash Money Quick’s (http://www.CashMoneyQuick.com) video ad for a “New FREE Ebook – How to Find MILLIONS in Private Money.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sua7AqOzgCA

My comment: Well I haven’t read the e-book, but the guy comes off nice enough and I like the palm tree in the background, suggestive of … long tropical vacations perhaps?

On drawing legal documents like a real attorney

Dmitry Mikhaylov (http://www.komelot.com) putting on a boot-camp, Attorney at Low, on how to prepare private money lenders documents.  “Find out from attorney what documents you will need to get Private money lenders money for your real estate needs.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBFcGD7LSbI

My comment: I like the “Attorney at Low” part.  There might be just a little bit more to the document process, but you get the general idea.

On self-directed IRAs

Self-Directed IRA’s are explained by Trent Dalrymple, Director of Investor Relations at Metro Mortgage Investments LLC, a private mortgage lender in Huntington Woods, Michigan. More info at www.metro-mi.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrdBlOU7nZA

My comment: This one I actually thought was quite good.  I have no wise-guy remarks.

Am I still in the real estate lending section?

This is an ad, for what I’m not sure but I enjoyed it.  The YouTube text states:  “Get private money, cash loans from lenders. Private individuals have money to give away today. Online. Instant cash now. Bad Credit ok. Lenders MUST give away cash now. Hurry. Money for real estat…”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIAUVgMRUnE

My comment: Va va voom!

Subliminal advertising

This is another ad:  “EASY LOAN TO BUY FORECLOSURES Hard Money can be a quick way to fund everything from residential property, to industrial facilities to new home construction.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjsMc3ExY2M

My comment: Did you notice the subtly placed images of cash and money–almost subliminal.  You might want to play it back again in slow motion.

And thus concludes your private money through the looking glass tour for today.  I sincerely hope that I have not come off as too terribly condescending.  (In general, these videos can’t be easy to do.)  I only wish that I could find better resources out there—text, video, and otherwise—that could be helpful to all of us in this complex realm of trust deed and private money investing.  And so the search goes on.  Please do share whatever you may have, whatever you may know, and whatever you may find.

— Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)