Fairfield Financial Services, Inc. - Private Money Loans, Lending & Borrowing

Private Money Source Investor Blog

Leading real estate value indicators

August 23rd, 2016

Clay Sparkman

Of particular interest to private money investors is to analyze and spot potential trends in real estate pricing. I recently posted an article, Three potentially useful indicators of the likely movement of property values, which proposed three potential indicators to watch.

The following article, Unlike prices, real estate jobs not back at peak, published in The Orange County Register, added some useful numbers to look at, and which I hadn’t really thought about previously.

If you are an investor in the realm of private money lending, I think that you will find this quite interesting and potentially useful in making investment decisions.

Please share any thoughts that you may have with regard to these indicators, and let us know of any other indicators that you look at when evaluating potential future price trends in a particular area.

Best, Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

A guide for private money lenders

July 14th, 2016

Clay Sparkman

I thought that this set of blog posts, A Guide For Private Money Lenders (in four parts), by Thad Merrill, was both interesting and informative, and so I thought I’d share them with you. (Ever vigilant: I’m combing the web for you.)

http://www.fortunebuilders.com/becoming-private-money-lender-part-1/

http://www.fortunebuilders.com/becoming-private-money-lender-part-2-breaking-private-money-loan/

http://www.fortunebuilders.com/becoming-private-money-lender-part-3-attract-investors/

http://www.fortunebuilders.com/private-hard-money-lenders-part-4/

Best, Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Fairfield Financial – Information for investors

July 8th, 2016

Clay Sparkman

Here is our *Information for Investors* section. It is direct and to the point. It tells you what you can expect of us and what we will expect to you, in a broker-relationship.

http://www.privatemoneysource.com/investors.php

Best, Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Private money according to Wikipedia

July 1st, 2016

Clay Sparkman

It is never easy to come up with a universal definition/description of private money. I thought it would be interesting to see what Wikipedia had to say about it, so I looked it up and this is what I found:

Here

I have to say, I think *they* did a pretty good job of it. This is more accurate and precise than most of what I read. What do you think? Do you see anything that is wrong? Do you see anything that is there, which shouldn’t be? Or do you not see something important that you would like to see?

I’d like to hear your thoughts.

Best, Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Private money – the rules of physics may not apply

June 3rd, 2016

Clay Sparkman

I first posted this article in August of 2009. That was right about when I was just getting started with the blog. It is hard to believe that it has been nearly seven years now. At any rate, I feel that this article deserves a second look (or a first look, if you are a more recent subscriber and haven’t been combing the archives). So here you go. Enjoy!

I would like to make a proposal. I would like to propose that the standard universal laws don’t necessarily apply to private money lending. That is, the things which we most take for granted—or assume to be true–may not be true in the realm of private money lending.

Let’s talk about systems for a moment. Let’s take physics as an example. Physics is the scientific mechanism which man has devised for describing, conceptualizing and predicting the behavior of the physical world. In the realm of physics, if one rule or one aspect of the system is called into question—even a small matter—then the entire system must be called into question. This has happened on various occasions as the science of physics has evolved, and as you can well imagine, it has caused quite a fuss among those who study physics.

My goal here is to break your notion that the things which you “know to be true” in the realm of private money lending can be correctly assumed to be true all the time. Let’s start with something absolutely fundamental.  Everyone agrees that there is a direct relationship between the perceived risk of loss of investment capital associated with a particular investment and the rate of return from that investment.  And I think it would be fair to say that pretty much everyone in the field agrees (1) that private money loans are riskier than their institutional counterparts (hereinafter referred to as institutional loans, a category to include conventional loans, sub-prime loans, and everything not included in the category of private money) and thus carry higher interest rates, and (2) that within the private money realm, riskier loans carry higher interest rates than those which are perceived to be less risky. I would be quite surprised if any of my readers take issue with either of these two basic notions. Let me clarify one more time because this is important: when I speak of risk here, I am referring to the risk of direct monetary loss of investment capital.

So let me now proceed to turn these two basic notions upside down. Fundamental notion #1 suggests that private money loans are riskier than institutional loans and that this is the reason why they carry higher interest rates. This is quite simply wrong. Institutional lenders don’t avoid risky loans per say. In fact, the sub-prime realm tends to thrive on them. Institutional lenders can (and do) factor known risk into their lending process. What institutional lenders will not tolerate is this: they will not tolerate loans which cannot be analyzed or characterized within a specific manageable and objective framework. Put another way, institutional lenders are only interested in commodity loans—as opposed, let’s say, to custom loans.

And why is this true? It is true because institutional lenders choose to manage risk as objectively as possible, and this can only be done effectively within a commodity-based loan system. Even though these lenders can accommodate almost any degree of risk, they prefer to factor out (wherever possible) risk which is anticipated buy not measurable. Using FICO scores and other specific measures, the typical institutional lender can predict to within a dime the value of their loan portfolios that will go bad (with the primary exception being vast rapid swings in the greater economy; there are many indicators, but ultimately these can only be  guessed at). Any given loan involves a certain amount of risk, but the risk associated with a portfolio of commodity loans is considered measurable.

In case you’re not buying this particular line of logic, and you think that I’m just working with smoke and mirrors here, let me offer some (fairly) objective data.  At Fairfield Financial, we manage a portfolio of 200+ private money loans at any given time, a package that adds up to about $30 million dollars in face value.  Our average mid-score for that package is between 650 and 660.  That portfolio sees an average of 2 loans per year go to REO.  That is a 1% foreclosure rate.  Those are good figures: 650-660 mid scores and 1% foreclosure rate. I suspect that many institutional lenders would rather enjoy such numbers. And thus, it seems that our loans are not necessarily more risky—or even as risky—as their institutional counterpart. Then of course our rates must be on par with the institutional realm as well, yes?  No. Our median interest rate is 13% (fixed).

Okay fine. Certain irregularities occur in the risk-reward relationship when crossing from the institutional money realm to the realm of private money. But surely we can say—with complete confidence–that within the realm of private money, riskier loans carry a higher rate of interest than those perceived to be less risky. Here again, I would respectively suggest: it just aint so!

Private money lenders are averse to risk–as are all investors.  However, private money lenders on the whole are particularly averse to risk of default (as opposed to risk of loss). Risk of default involves (a) temporary cash flow interruptions (something we affectionately refer to as “cashflowus interuptus”), (b) lying awake at nights and worrying about non-performing or sporadically-performing loans (which we call “bad boys”), and (c) lots of hassles and many hours of work (which tend to accompany the bad boys).

In fact, I would assert that on the whole private money lenders are less averse to risk of long-term potential loss then they are to risk of default, which we shall refer to hereafter as the “bad boy problems.”  I have spent the past 15 years of my life pricing private money loans and have a pretty good idea of how the market works. Pricing private money loans is a little like pricing antiques but tougher; it is a highly subjective process. But of course there are certain guidelines. One takes a hard look at the long-term risk of the loan and at the potential for bad boy problems. I would argue that the best indicator of long-term risk is LTV. Bad boy problem indicators (such as credit, income, and pay history) may play into the risk equation, but as any private money lender will tell you, they are betting on the equity first and the borrower second—and in fact the borrower is a distant second. Having established LTV as a risk indicator, let’s look for a bad boy indicator. Let’s go with FICO mid-score. I have found that FICO mid-score is indeed a very reliable indicator of the likelihood that you will have a bad boy on your hands. When it comes to financial responsibility/performance, it seems that the past is a very good predictor of the future.

So now we have two objective scales to work with: LTV and FICO mid-score. Here I’m going to take a giant leap (very unscientific, but also very interesting) and make the assumption that these two scales are basically linear. The LTV scale for private money loans basically runs from 0% to 75%.  The FICO mid-score scale runs from 300 to 850.  So that now we have established a ratio of 7.33 between the two scales ([850-300]/75). Thus we can say that a 10% change in LTV on the risk scale is roughly proportionate to a change of 73 in FICO mid-score on the bad boy scale.

If risk is the primary factor driving interest rate, then a 75% LTV loan to a borrower with a 700 mid-score would carry a higher interest rate than a 55% LTV loan to a borrower with a 554 mid-score. Well, in fact just the opposite happens.  Equalizing for other factors, I would tend to price the first loan at 12-13% and the second loan at 14-15%.  So you see, long-term risk is a distant second to bad boy factors when pricing a private money loan.

Someone I respect immensely recently said that it is not what we don’t know that endangers us the most. It is what we think we know but know incorrectly.

If you go away from this post knowing that the risk-reward relationship as applied to private money is a myth, then you have learned a little something. If you lie awake tonight and wonder if things that go up in the private money universe really must come down—then that, dare I say, may qualify as an epiphany.

Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Several perspectives on private money and changes happening in the industry

May 24th, 2016

Clay Sparkman

With regard to forward thinking (that is, how is the industry changing?): I thought you might appreciate this article, Private Lending Sector Making Big Noise for Real Estate Investors, by Ben Stoodley:

Here

Certainly he is correct with regard to his interpretation of current trends, and one must wonder how far this might all go.

And with regard to the growth in private money as an investment vehicle, the following blog post, Real Estate Most Successful Investment for Self-Directed IRA Investors in 2015, According to IRA Financial Group Survey, is telling.

Here

I believe that we are entering a new future–a brave new world. As a family, we’ve been in the Private Money Lending business for 52 years. It hasn’t changed much during most of that time. However, I fee it changing rapidly now. I recommend that we all remain vigilant. There will be an advantage for those who recognize the changes and trends and act on them accordingly. May that be us.

All comments, as always, are welcome.

Thanks,

Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Into the mainstream

May 13th, 2016

Clay Sparkman

I thought that this recent article in The National Real Estate Investor would be worth sharing with the private money investors in this group. It certainly rings true with those of us at Fairfield, as we have had to work with our investors to adapt our programs and strategies to a changing market (becoming more competitive in whatever ways possible without generally taking on a significantly greater deal of risk).

Click here

Our median rate has dropped from 13% to 11% and we are more flexible on points. I also feel that we should consider lending up to 70% LTV for strong loans. (Currently most of our loans are at 65%.)

Please weigh in and give us your opinion on any of this.

Thanks,

Clay

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

Three potentially useful indicators of the likely movement of property values

April 25th, 2016

Clay Sparkman

Any good private money investor should be attempting  to assess whether property values are rising, falling,  or holding in the area of his/her latest potential investment. After all, the core issue  when assessing investment risk is LTV, and if the “V” part of “LTV” falls during the time of your investment, your investment is becoming increasingly risky. Given so, if you sense that values are likely to fall in a certain investment region, you had better take that into account when deciding whether or not to invest. And if you decide to invest, given this information (whatever it may lead you to believe), you will be able to better assess your investment criteria and determine what you consider to be a safe LTV.

The direction of property values is not an easy thing to predict, but if one really wants to inform themselves with regard to what property values might be doing in the near future, than there are three pretty good things to look at.

But first, what not to count on: If you are looking at whether or not property values are rising, falling or holding today, just remember that this is a trailing indicator. At best it will tell you what is happening now, and even worse, it may be a better indicator of what happened several months ago. Look at this info, but don’t take it very seriously as an indicator of what is going to happen next.

And so, here are three leading indicators that I would recommend you consider:

(1) The rural test: Ask  yourself what property values are doing in rural (or more remote) areas. Those values tend to lead the values of properties in more concentrated areas. So, if you are suddenly witnessing a notable fall in values in rural areas, chances are that other values in the region will follow.

(2) The time-on-market test: Determine what the average time on market is as you assess potential opportunities . For residential properties 3-6 months is fairly normal, and would tend to indicate that values will be holding for awhile. Last time I checked in Portland, the average time on market for residential properties was 1.7. This is a very low number and a very good indicator that values are on the rise.

(3) Look at the ratio of replacement cost to purchase price. If the ratio of replacement cost to purchase price is high, then property values are likely to rise, at least for the near-term future.

Let me know if you have any other indicators that you use. We would like to hear about them.

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

25 questions you must ask

January 22nd, 2016

Clay Sparkman

I originally published this article in September of 2009 on this blog.

I’m going to make a list today of twenty-five important questions that I believe an investor must ask prior to funding any private money loan transaction.  I’m not going to elaborate much on each particular item here, but will drill down on each of the individual items in future posts.  For the sake of simplifying this discussion to a reasonable level, I’d like to start with several assumptions: (1) we are only talking about loans secured by real property, (2) we are only talking about first position loans, and (3) we are not talking about land development or raw land loans.  (Each of these exceptions, if removed, would be good for another whole list of special questions; we’ll save those particular scenarios for future discussion.)

(1) What is the Loan to Value (LTV) ratio of the loan you are considering and how does that fit with your own risk limits regarding this particular loan and property type?

(2) If this is a value-added loan (construction, rehab, or development), what is the front-end LTV?  Font-end LTV refers to the LTV immediately after the close of escrow but prior to any construction/development or disbursement of construction holdback funds.  (I generally reference this as FLTV, and it is understood that LTV, for a project actually refers to the LTV upon completion of the construction/development and full disbursement of any/all hold-back funds.)

(3) How confident are you of the value?  The “L” part in LTV is easy.  It is the “V” part that can be quite difficult to accurately determine, and in fact it must be understood that any such determination (no matter how good) is only an estimate.

(4) What are the recent market trends for the area in which the property is located?  Given the real estate market of the past two years, this question is particularly relevant.

(5) How is the borrower’s credit?  What is the mid-score, what are the issues, if any, and what is the trend?

(6) If the loan is a refi: how is the borrower’s pay history on the existing loan?

(7) How much “skin” will the borrower have in the game at the close of escrow?  In other words, how much cash or additional collateral is the borrower bringing to the table?

(8) If this is a real estate development or investment loan or a loan to a business owner occupying his own property: what is the relevant experience and background of this borrower?

(9) What is the purpose of the loan and how will the funds be utilized?

(10) What is the term of the loan?

(11) Can the borrower afford to make payments OR does the loan scenario otherwise involve an adequate interest reserve?

(12) What is the borrower’s plan/exit strategy, and how likely is the borrower of success?

(13) What is the borrower’s net worth and how liquid are the borrower’s assets?

(14) If there are one or more structures on the property, will you be listed as loss payee on a hazard insurance policy at the close of escrow (or prior to the beginning of construction if new construction is being funded)?

(15) If there is a construction hold-back, who is administering this and do you trust them to do so effectively?

(16) Have you reviewed the operative preliminary title insurance policy and approved any liens that your title insurance policy will be listing as exceptions to your position?

(17) Is your loan compliant with all state and federal disclosure and usury laws?

(18) Will all taxes be paid current at closing?

(19) What is the likelihood that there are any serious hazardous waste issues associated with the property?

(20) What is the likelihood that there are any wetland issues associated with the property?

(21) If relevant: what is the status of all required permits, entitlements, or other government approvals?

(22) What is the likelihood of one or more construction labor/materials liens taking precedent over your lien position?

(23) Does the loan size/amount, location, type etc. allow you to obtain optimal diversification?

(24) What is your plan for servicing the loan?

(25) If the loan involves a fractional interest, how comfortable are you joining with the other lenders involved in the loan?

So that’s my list for now.  There is nothing special about the number twenty-five, and I may well have left off some very important items, so please provide feedback as to which items you agree with, which ones you don’t, and what other items you might feel absolutely must be on a list of this sort.

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909 or 800-971-1858)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.

How to read an appraisal

November 17th, 2015

Clay Sparkman

This article was originally published, on The Private Money Broker Blog. on 8/9/10. Some 5+ years later, I feel it is worthy to be modified slightly and published again. Whatever you do in the real estate business, I highly recommend that you give this post a good read.

The most important thing that you must understand about any appraisal (or other real estate valuation instrument) is that it is only as good as its logic.  So that—in other words—you must never accept an appraisal’s conclusion regarding value without looking beyond the surface to understand the logic that leads to the conclusion and without making some reasonable determination as to the quality of the logical argumentation.

With that in mind, I offer you ten critical steps to follow when reading/analyzing (and thus attempting to assess the “goodness” of) an appraisal.

(1)    The very first thing you must ask as you analyze an appraisal is to what degree is the appraisal transparent?  In other words, how much of the logic leading to the value conclusion is on display for you the reader?  If the answer is none, the appraisal is useless.  Throw it away.  If the answer is some (in other words there are gaps in the logic) then you must either (a) once again, decide to toss the appraisal, (b) decide to accept some degree of uncertainty, (c) attempt to fill the gaps on your own, or (d) contact the appraiser and see if she can provide the missing logic.  (Sometimes the appraiser will have the information you need on file, but they just didn’t include it in their final report.)  Ideally the answer is none or very little, and the appraisal can be said to be highly transparent.  At any rate, you will need to be asking this question throughout your analysis.

(2)    The next thing you need to do is get a handle on what is being appraised.  Is it a home, a commercial building, a parcel of land?  What are the basic specifications?  Where is it located?  Is it urban or rural?  How desirable is the surrounding area?  Are there functional inadequacies?  If it is land, what horizontal infrastructure is in place or lacking and what does the current zoning allow?

(3)    I have never heard anyone else say this, but I stand by it (at least when valuing buildings and structures; for valuing land, not so much): one of the first things I do after getting a basic sense of the property is go straight to the photos.  (And by the way, make sure you have an original appraisal or color copies.  The photos can be quite useful, but not if they are blacked out by copying and faxing.)  I study the photos of the subject property and then I compare them to the photos of each of the various comps.  You will be surprised at how often you will begin to sniff some bad cheese at this point in the process (particularly when dealing with structures).  What you are looking for here is: (a) whether or not the comps are in the same general condition as the subject property, and (b) whether or not the comps are in the same general “class” as the subject property.  By class I am referring to the level of quality and distinction of the property.  If the answer to one or both of these is no, it is not necessarily game over, but you will now be looking even more closely at the adjustment matrix later on to see if the apparent differences are effectively accounted for to your satisfaction.

(4)    Next, you will want to check the effective date of the value given.  How current is the appraisal?  In a steady up economy we used to be comfortable using appraisals that were as much as 1-2 years old.  We would adjust the value to be in-line with changes in the market.  With the chaos of the past 5+ years, this method is not as effective and must be utilized with great care.  Generally speaking (though this would depend to a certain extent on the region) you would want your appraisal to be less than 6 months old.

(5)    Check carefully to see if there are any “subject to” items associated with the value.  Generally this will initially be indicated by checking a box that indicates the appraised value is subject to certain additions, improvements, or modifications as indicated later in the appraisal.  This of course is a critical item, so make sure you have read through the entire body of the appraisal so as not to miss any such “subject to” items or conditions.

(6)    Look to see if any extraordinary assumptions are made by the appraiser.  Here again, you will be forced to read through the entire body of the appraisal to be sure.  On more than a few occasions I have seen what looked to be a perfectly reasonable appraisal completely neutralized (or actually nullified) at the discovery of one or more extraordinary assumptions.  The problem with most extraordinary assumptions is that they are indeed extraordinary.  If I am evaluating a parcel of bare land zoned rural agricultural, and an extraordinary assumption in my appraisal states that “The zoning will be changed to allow multi-unit residential at 8 units per acre.” … well chances are, the gig is up.  Even if some serious local zoning change is in the works, what is the chance that you can count on it to come through and thus turn this “straw” property into gold?

(7)    Take an accounting of the methods utilized for valuing the subject property.  In my opinion, a market sales comparison approach is ALWAYS essential and should be the primary method—and the one given most weight—in valuing a property.  The only true value in a  market economy is the amount that others are willing to pay for it, and thus the attempt to estimate market value by looking at recent sales—though still at best a process of estimation—is the only method we have that goes to the heart of the matter.  Beyond that, it would be nice to have a cost approach and an income approach (where relevant) but these are, in my opinion, at best a good way to cross-check the market value derived by the comparison approach.

(8)    Another thing you need to take a close look at is the aging of the comps.  If all the comps were sold quite recently, then you are good in this department.  But if one or more of the comps are more than 6 months old, this may be a problem.  The next step would be to look at the comp matrix to see how much the appraiser adjusts the target value to factor comp aging.  If one or more of the comps are listings … well then, these aren’t really comps at all.  I have seen comp workups using nothing but listings.  This is totally unacceptable. Anyone can list a property for any price they want.  It would perhaps be reasonable to have 1-2 listings along with at least as many “true” comps, but even this is getting into squishy territory.  So here again, you would have to look at how the appraiser adjusted the subject value based on the “listing” comps.

(9)    You should spend the majority of your effort fussing over the comp matrix.  This is the matrix which compares various characteristics of the subject property with various characteristics of the comps and makes specific adjustments for each of the comps to arrive at adjusted values for the comps (effectively attempting to monetarily “convert” each of the comps into the subject property).  If you have: (a) many adjustments, (b) large adjustments (relative to the price of the property), and/or many seemingly subjective adjustments, then you may want to seriously question the integrity of the appraisal.  You will want to walk through each and every adjustment, and here again, you must look for transparency.  Does the appraiser explain the logic behind his adjustment decisions?  If not, you have a transparency problem.  At the end of the day, you must be comfortable with the adjustments and you must feel that they are objective, transparent, well thought out, and seemingly reasonable.  If not, you must either (a) discard the appraisal, (b) contact the appraiser for further explanation, and/or (c) revise one or  more adjustments and revise the final subject value accordingly.

(10) And finally you will want to be sure and take a look at other methods of valuation utilized (generally income and cost on commercial appraisals).  And then you will want to determine how the appraiser has gone about reconciling the different values arrived at utilizing different methods.  Sometimes a weighted value approach is used.  If so, how much weight is being given to the comp value approach relative to other methods utilized.  As you may have guessed by now, I generally like to see all or at least the vast majority of weight given to the comp analysis.  If the appraisal doesn’t explain the reconciliation, you have a transparency problem.  If the comp value approach is not given enough weight, you may want to fall back on the value arrived at by the comp value approach as your own final value.

And there you have it.  There is a great deal more that can be said about reading an appraisal, and certainly this list of ten items is far from exhaustive, but it does give you a few things that you will not want to overlook.  If anyone has their own favorite “crucial” steps, I would love to hear about them.  Please let me know and I will share them with the group.

Last word:  Don’t think that you don’t need to “read” an appraisal just because you are the loan broker or the borrower, thus relying on the work of the appraiser to be true and accurate given their credentials.  I often ask brokers and borrowers if they have read the appraisals they have submitted, and what their opinion was. If they haven’t read the appraisal or clearly haven’t put the effort in to attempt to understand and make sense of it … well that wouldn’t necessarily kill the deal, but to my mind it highlights a potentially serious credibility issue.  As a broker (and certainly as a professional investor borrower), you must read and understand the items that you are submitting.  Anything less will generally become apparent to the lender and will ultimately undermine your ability to do your job effectively.

– Clay (clay@privatemoneysource.com, 503-476-2909 or 800-971-1858)

Clay is Vice President of Fairfield Financial, a primary source for private money loans since 1964.  Fairfield works with a broad range of private money investors, in a broker capacity, finding, underwriting, presenting, closing, servicing, and when necessary, assisting in the workout of difficult loans.